Reading the diff over blind accepts
Auto-accepting feels fast, but you're just accumulating debt. Actually look at what the AI wrote before you commit it.
Evolve from vibecoding to production code
Auto-accepting feels fast, but you're just accumulating debt. Actually look at what the AI wrote before you commit it.
That code you don't understand today? Good luck debugging it at 2am. Know what you're putting in your codebase.
AI writes code, you make decisions. It's co-pilot, not autopilot. Your brain is still required.
"It works" is step one. "It's maintainable" is what separates prototypes from production.
That "temporary" hack? It's going to be there for years. Write code like future you is going to review it.
It feels like magic. Code appears at the speed of thought. Auto-accept and boom—your feature is done. It's addictive.
For prototypes? Hackathons? Exploring weird ideas at 3am? Vibecode away.
But then you ship that prototype. Users touch it. It breaks in ways you never expected because you never actually understood what you built. Production is different.
The code you don't understand today is the bug you can't fix tomorrow.
So here's the deal: same AI, same speed, but you actually read the code first. That's vibepairing. Revolutionary concept, I know. 😅
Same as vibecoding. AI generates whatever you asked for.
Wild idea: look at the diff before accepting. What did it do? Does this make sense? Will future you understand this?
Accept, tweak, or reject. You're the human. Act like it.